Essay about The Legalization of Marijuana - 1749 Words

Marijuana is a misunderstood drug. Many assume that the usage of marijuana, or cannabis, is dangerous, but it can be the exact opposite. So why is the legalization of marijuana in the United States such a problem for many people today? Considered to be a gateway drug and the reason for the downfall of our youth nowadays, marijuana has developed a negative reputation. Lester Grinspoon, a professor at Harvard University, states, â€Å"Few drugs in the United States have produced as much affective heat as marijuana, particularly during the last decade. The controversy essentially revolves around the question of how dangerous or safe the drug is. However, many people are persistent users and believe that this drug is no more harmful than†¦show more content†¦From 1937 to 1947, the United States government had spent $220 million on the war against marijuana; and by 1969, the government had spent about $9 billion on the war, a price that is still rising to this day (Nevius). The United States has spent much time and wealth against marijuana, which does not contribute any positive reinforcement to the harsh economy. It is true, of course, that marijuana kills brain cells and tissue. Smoking or consuming marijuana in any way can be very harmful to the brain (Katel). Though there is no convincing scientific evidence that marijuana causes psychological damage or mental illness in either teenagers or adults, marijuana users will experience loss of brain cells, which can be dangerous but does not cause permanent mental illnesses. The human brain is required to live, breathe, and carry out any action throughout life. Consuming massive amounts of marijuana will destroy brain cells, which are vital to trigger thoughts, movements, interactions, and memory. The tissue within our brains eventually corrode due to marijuana usage. Like all tissues and organs in the human body, brain tissue serve many different functions, and when the functions are limited, the tissue deteriorate (Borden). Daily use of marijuana could make the smoker experience psychological distress following marijuana intake, which may include feelings of panic, anxiety, paranoia, and loss of memory. On the other hand, using marijuana canShow MoreRelatedThe Legalization Of Marijuana Legalization1061 Words   |  5 PagesThe Legalization of Cannabis in Ohio Marijuana is a controversial topic all across the United States. Recently marijuana has been voted on, legalized, and denied legalization in multiple states. There are still more states trying to fight the green fight for marijuana. The fight for legalization hasn’t been an easy one for cannabis supporters; they have been fighting tooth and nail to make it happen. One of the main concerns in the marijuana debates are whether or not marijuana is a gateway drugRead MoreLegalization Of Marijuana And Marijuana1633 Words   |  7 PagesBalyuk March 8, 2016 Legalization of Marijuana Marijuana has a few different names that are commonly used in today’s society including weed and cannabis. Weed is smoked with joints, bongs, or pipes. Marijuana can also be mixed with foods usually brownies, cookies, and candy which are called edibles. The main chemical responsible for the high feeling is called THC but marijuana also contains over 500 chemicals. The chemical is found in resin produced by the leaves and buds. â€Å"Marijuana is the most commonlyRead MoreThe Legalization Of Marijuana Legalization Essay2566 Words   |  11 Pagescurrent prohibition on marijuana reforms has put the United States in a similar situation. Marijuana is the most widely used illicit drug in the United States. According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, â€Å"95 million Americans age 12 and older have tried pot at least once, and three out of every four illicit-drug users reported using marijuana within the previous 30 days† (ONDCP). The decriminalization and eve ntually legalization for the recreational use of marijuana will bring forth benefitsRead MoreThe Legalization Of Marijuana Legalization1282 Words   |  6 Pages On November 8th, 2016, the California Marijuana Legalization Initiative may be included on the ballot. The people of California will vote on whether to legalize the recreational use of cannabis for adults. The move targets at regulating the consumption of the drug and taxing it like other legalized drugs. California was the first state to legalize medical marijuana in 1996 (National Institute of Drug Abuse). The state prohibited any legal actions from being taken on patients and recognized caregiversRead MoreThe Legalization Of Marijuana And Marijuana Essay1314 Words   |  6 PagesMarijuana or Cannabis is one of the bused drugs in America and the rest of the world. Interesting accumulating evidence show that the significant negative impact of this drug outweighs the positive effects. However, the medical benefits of the drug seem on the process of chemical compounds as compared to the drug itself. Medical debates show that chemical compound in marijuana are the problem as compared to the plant. The said chemical compound affects the mental and physical health of the personsRead MoreThe Legalization Of Marijuana Legalization1660 Words   |  7 PagesKyler Smith 9/15 â€Å"Marijuana Legalization† The legality of cannabis varies from country to country. Possession of cannabis is illegal in most countries and has been since the beginning of widespread cannabis prohibition in the late 1930s. However, possession of the drug in small quantities had been decriminalized in many countries and sub-national entities in several parts of the world. Furthermore, possession is legal or effectively legal in the Netherlands, Uruguay, and in the US states of ColoradoRead MoreThe Legalization Of Marijuana Legalization996 Words   |  4 Pages the monetary gain of its legalization for most has been productive to say the least. For example, Denver Colorado is on track to more than triple the marijuana tax revenue this year alone. $44 million was collected in 2014. In July 2015, 73.5 million was collected, while 19.6 million went to schools. A place such as Chicago could really use the legalization to help with the school system infrastructure issues they have. With a deficit of over 1.1 bi llion marijuana sales could alleviate bothRead MoreLegalization of Marijuana1550 Words   |  7 PagesLegalization of Marijuana: Benefits and Statistics The topic of legalizing marijuana has been a topic of controversy for quite some time now not only throughout our local streets, but throughout the local and into the state government. The legalization of marijuana is such a controversial topic because some are for it and some are against it. People are for the legalization because of the great uses it has towards medicine, the money that could come from the taxation of legalized marijuana, andRead MoreLegalization of Marijuana972 Words   |  4 PagesOn January 1st the states of Colorado and Washington officially began the regulation of legal marijuana sales. Thousands of people from all over the country including tourists from Wisconsin, Ohio, Chicago, and even Georgia lined up out front of dispensaries to make a purchase. Recreational marijuana is being regulated and monitored like alcohol; you must be at least 21 years old to make a purchase. The drug, which is controversial in many states’ legislations, is currently l egal for medical useRead MoreMarijuana Legalization1212 Words   |  5 PagesMarijuana Legalization COMP 1500 April 20th, 2009 Word Count: 807 Outline I. Introduction Thesis Statement: Although America is the land of the free you do not really have  too many  free choices you can make. Americans  should have  the right to  choose whether or not  marijuana should be legal. II. Background III. The tax benefits that can be created A. If legalized they can tax it how ever much they want B. Can be regulated IV. Drug enforcement money can be diverted

After the Civil War Free Essays

After the Civil War, industrialization changed American culture, as railways connected developing urban communities and manufacturing plants pulled in floods of foreign laborers. By the late nineteenth century, numerous reformers looked to enhance the conditions in which numerous Americans worked and lived. Imperialism is the strategy of broadening a country’s power over different nations by financial, political or military means. We will write a custom essay sample on After the Civil War or any similar topic only for you Order Now The objective of the Americans for imperialism was for new markets would expand exchange which provided money, military power enhanced control, so it could contend with different nations, and social dominance so it could spread America’s way of life like religion, and language. The United States’ industrialization was developing so quickly that it was creating a bigger number of products than individuals could consume, and so American Imperialism was justified because of the overabundance of modern merchandise that drove the United States to search for entrance and venture into worldwide markets which were essential in making it a World Power. A U.S. representative’ speech had motivations in how the US gained with trades and starting to become wealthy, they still didn’t have a strong army nor navy. But it still fought for against the Spanish and fight for the rights of Cubans that suffered under the Spanish empire, even does many Americans didn’t support this because many weren’t ready for war. However, Albert Beveridge who was running for US Senator in 1898 had motivations to assure that US imperialism was necessary, that it was an ethical commitment to spreading their insight and prevalence of American’s religion and government overall less lucky individuals. For McKinley’s decision in the early 1900s after the Spanish War ended, with motivations that he pretentiously repudiated the U.S. army accomplishment of the Philippines under their control. The Hawaiian Memorial during 1897, the reason behind this was to remove the US government because they believed their nationality was being extinguished, but the US call to vote for annexation for the need of naval bases to protect the world trade. A letter brought questioning to many Americans if a severe fight between the Philippines and United States was worth the expansion because of the idea of imperialism. Each source shows different points of views on how larger nations gave to the smaller colonies. Social and cultural changes led many in the U.S. to conclude at the time had come for the country to assert its power beyond the borders. American Imperialism was justified because of the overabundance of modern merchandise that drove the United States to search for entrance and venture into worldwide markets which were essential in making it a World Power. As the United States’ empire started to be advanced, leaders and officials led the nation in a burst of overseas expansion in which it acquired Hawaii, the Philippines, Puerto Rico etc. The way to sustain prosperity was to find foreign markets for U.S. goods. Beveridge compared the Philippines colonization to U.S. westward expansion across North America and argued that Filipinos were a child-like and savage race incapable of self-governance. The American imperialism was important for the urge to fulfill United States’ destiny–as a world power by colonizing, looking for fresh land to conquer in which opening new markets, was a favorable balance of trade, and make exports exceed imports, sought to expand foreign markets. Development was the principal center of American Imperialism justification, which ought to enable the United States to pick up much benefit as could reasonably be expected. This brought about the advancement of new items and administrations, as well as in different nations–this had powered financial development. As innovations expanded, the American homesteads and manufacturing plants creations were significantly more than American natives could expand. The government saw the remote exchange as the solution for American over creation. In any case, this thought of exchange likewise brought problems as the main path for trade products among the US and different countries. The larger part through overcoming those countries that were self-administered or even under control by different countries (the Philippines and Spain). However, the Filipinos felt sold out when the U.S. took control of their country and wound up irate. Indeed, regardless of what the Filipinos felt the Americans would not like to abandon them to self-administer, on the grounds that they since a long time after a short time have strife and botch over there more unfortunate than Spain’s wars. Concerning numerous Americans, this thought of development brought riches however for a couple brought demise, as wars caused the passing of numerous soldiers in every country. To the extent the entire needs were concerned, they requested that the wrongdoing (mercilessness battling the Philippines) ought to be ceased and that America could wipe out the disgraceful nation. To be a world power, United States needed to have land beyond its borders (expansion) that the Americans could control. On the time whilst in all the different countries the public economic system become subjected to deep changes in the outcome of the warfare, showing itself mainly in the decline of money, excessive cost of residing—America had not the simplest now not suffered from the struggle, but at the opposite the country had gained by way of it and became during that time World Power. Having increase sources, and a few strategic positioning of colonies better exchange and raise the American financial system. Which kind of along the lines takes place the Manifest Destiny, colonizing overseas lands brought about the United States spreading its wealth, have an effect on and lifestyle overseas. Imperialism turned into a key aspect in creating an extra civil overseas human. Even in changes in the recent past events the imperialistic developments likewise had a worldwide effect that emerged between countries like wars that made an endeavor at holding their opportunity. In the long run, these wars were a factor in the foundations for WWI. But this event to the counter colonialist contention that America shouldn’t administer individuals without their assent, by expressing that freedom gets its power from the assent of the administered, just by those equipped for self-government. It contrasted with Indians enable Americans to administer without an assent and parents likewise oversee over their youngsters without their assent. America should spare them from countries as opposed to giving them self-run of catastrophe. Much like a youngster who needs direction (government). With conflicts, outside and within the borders of US, imperialism remains justified more than a century later as it could become the World Power in the past and present. How to cite After the Civil War, Papers

Antiscience Animal Lovers

Question: Discuss about theAntisciencefor Animal Lovers. Answer: Introduction Anti science elements are intricately associated with each and every section in different nations. They have a considerable role in alternating the course of output of different scientific advancements that a nation wants to take to provide betterment of the world. This group of elements comprises of ideas which reject science and different scientific approaches. It mainly considers them as views which are unnecessarily hyped out and never considers science as an objective method that solves answers to million dollar questions. They never believe that Science helps people to thrive with utmost comfort and knowledge (Wardle et al. 2013, pg. 15). Such type of elements was present even in the times when the most successful discoveries were made like those during the time of Copernicus or Galileo. The anti science behavior of the authoritative person of those era mainly placed their ANTISCIENCE belief on the shoulders of the Almighty (Chern 2015, pg. 45). They even went further to sacrifice lives of the people challenging their beliefs. In the present era, anti science elements and people are harboring such concepts and are present in different sectors of nation with the politics being the biggest sector. In the present generation, a huge amount of protest s have been initiated by the nature lovers as well as the animal lovers who claim that animal lives are also costly and cannot be butchered or sacrificed for the betterment of science. Over the decades, different types of medical testing or discovery of medicines and their advantageous effects are first applied on animals in order to get an idea about the results it might have on human beings (Kricheldorf 2016, pg 53-69). It has been severely criticized by the animal lovers that animals like human beings are also precious creations of God and therefore their lives are also costly. The animal lovers also declared that their lives should not be taken away as they are helpless and cannot express their feelings. Environmentalists demand that forceful sacrifice of such animals lead to loss of ecological balance. This feud had been continued for a lot of time. Thereby it had reached solutions where judges have found their claim to be more valid than the scientists who believed it to be an essential process for scientific advancements. However, the matter is not that easy and clear as it seems and there lies many powers that had contributed for the decisions to be accepted by the judges. The main powers which had indeed been the real players behind the law being passed is the ANTISCIENCE mentality of the politicians who have been the influencers as well as the nagging people that confirmed this law to be implemented. They had a clear idea that comparatively a larger section of the society believes in science than the section who believe in anti-science. They are witty enough not to make this section excited by declaration of their primitive ideas in the modern generations. Therefore it can be concluded that they achieved their aim in a polished way by demeaning the practice of science of using animal models for their testing purposes. The anti-science people critically evaluated and excited the emotional cords of the animal lovers and environmentalists. By these, they made and attack on the scientific advancements and fulfill their wishes. One might raise an arguments which will state that the politicians are unnecessarily been dragged in to the controversy that has nothing to do with politics. Herein one needs to specify the typical feelings that the anti science elements harbor. It has been researched over the years that many politicians deny the concept of universality as well as the legitimization of alternatives (Latham 2014, pg 24). They also believe that the outcomes of the scientific results are usually devoid of any underlying reality. Politicians also feel that science cannot reflect the ideology of the dominant groups that are present in the society and therefore it should have no existence. They have also not taken the initiative of nuclear movement of the past and have started an anti nuclear movement overstating the negative effects of nuclear power. There are many politicians who still are ardent followers of conspiracy theories and creationism and strictly oppose the evolutionary approach of Science to be demeaning even in 2027. Therefore one can easily link such ideologies to be acting as a very important background that supported the law of banning animal use in scientific studies. One can also establish the point that indeed the laws that were published for the animal use ban in science was more than a push from the ANTISCIENCE elements of the government besides the animal lovers. This was based on the regular debate of many politically thinking individuals and science lovers are the controversial topic of The Appeal to Nature the Naturalistic Fallacy. In Australia, being a westernized country, it is indeed very astonishing to find that even in the modern year of 2027, a portion of people believes that everything which is natural is good and also right and anything that tries to manipulate it is ought to be negative or bad. There is an ANTISCIENCE belief in here that science with advising courses and technologies have tried to disrupt the natural flow of nature (Dvorsky 2017). This had lead to the argumentation between both the parties. The ANTISCIENCE people believes that all things natural are wholesome and efficient whereas anything unnatural is unhealthy and also unsavory. Researchers who have worked on the topic have found that the main root of the conviction arises from the assumption which is unfounded that the scientific achievements and the technological advancements which are made lie outside nature. They also believe that the activities undertaken by science in the entire universe often causes disruption of not only the natural flow but also the flow of equilibrium of things (McCredie Mitchell 2013). From this view, one can easily understand that this kind of thinking are the main contributors of the obstructions for different biological research, genomic and also several such ideas. In the preliminary years of the decades, there was a huge debate where a large portion of the society mainly containing the anti science elements protested against the use of millions of money over the research projects that are conducted in the country. They even started holding meetings to discuss about the expenses of the government over the researchers and even raised questions on the credibility of the grants allocated for the science researches (Star 2016, pg. 13). Previous few years back, around 2016 to 2017, a section of the politician demanded that millions of money were getting wasted on researches which are absurd and did not hold any value to the development of the nation. Although proper explanation was not been able to them, this debate had continued for years. However, researches were still being carried out with outcomes that had a very fruitful result for developing the health of different patient with diseases (Fiatt 2013, pg 57). Therefore one can easily site this as an example which proved their ANTISCIENCE attitudes which might have played a crucial role in animal ban used for researches in the present era as well. Another argument can also be based here which will prove that how anti-science elements have been forced into ordinary citizens regular life by a political party. A few years back a political party had come up to be named as the Health Australia Party called the HAP which proposed the use of Alternative medicine as the main treatment that should be done in case of the patients. They clearly propagated the concept that removal of the influence of the multinational pharmaceutical companies was necessary along with the application of evidence based unbiased real world clinical studies with targeted spending (Science-Based Medicine 2017). Through this, they clearly tried to infuse in peoples mind the differences between the so called natural and pharmaceutical medicines. They tried to override the fact that there are many pharmaceutical medicines which are formed from the components of nature only. They used the term pharmaceutical as a buzzword to make people dislike such medicines. Wit h the term unbiased clinical trial they tried to implement that the randomized control methods scientists conduct to perform experiments are manipulated and hence should be neglected with preference on unbiased natural real world studies (Mayo 2014, pg. 78). They also advised to target the spending on the researches and apply the research funds wisely. They even advised not to pay more heed to from a diseases management system and to be more concerned about the health creation system. From these advices formed by the political party, it was very well understood that how they wanted to stop expenditure and conductance of scientific research and promote the use of alternative medicine. This gives a clear idea about how similar parties have tried to stop the advancement of science by trying their best to brainwash the ordinary citizens and by creating barriers in the field of science (Lindenmayer 2013, pg. 250-255). All the arguments stated above gives a clear idea about how the ANTISCIENCE elements of the government have always come forward to create obstacles in the path of advancement of science. Hence it can be formulated that the animal use ban which had been passed by the legal system of the nation with the plea from the animal lovers and also the environmentalists might have also been the result of continuous push and also support from these elements within the system. As a citizen of the nation, one can comment that neither of the system should try to create harm and barriers for the other system. A balanced maintenance of the ideologies is necessary to help ordinary citizens lead a better life with hopes and aspirations for the future. References: Chern, K., 2015. A Middle Power's National Interest.Australia's Trade, Investment and Security in the Asian Century, p.45. Dvorsky, G. 2017. 8 Logical Fallacies That Fuel Anti-Science Sentiments. [online] Gizmodo.com.au. Available at: https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2016/04/8-logical-fallacies-that-fuel-anti-science-sentiments/ [Accessed 28 Feb. 2017]. FlAtt, J., 2013. Critical discourse analysis of rhetoric against complementary medicine.Creative Approaches to Research,6(2), p.57. Kricheldorf, H.R., 2016. Antiscience and Antireductionism. InGetting It Right in Science and Medicine(pp. 53-69). Springer International Publishing. Latham, M., 2014.The Political Bubble: Why Australians Don't Trust Politics. Macmillan Publishers Aus.. Lindenmayer, D., 2013. From biodiversity to bioperversity: from good science to poor environmental policy.Pacific Conservation Biology,19(4), pp.250-255. Mayo, O., 2014. Genetically modified organisms, science and the humanities.Meanjin,73(1), p.78. McCredie, J. and Michell, N. eds., 2013.The Best Australian Science Writing 2013. NewSouth. Science-Based Medicine. 2017. Australias New Antiscience Party. [online] Available at: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/australias-new-antiscience-party/ [Accessed 28 Feb. 2017]. Skidmore, M.J., 2016. Populism and its perils: language and politics.Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sk?odowska, sectio KPolitologia,22(1), p.7. Star, S.L., 2016. 1 Revisiting Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology.Boundary Objects and Beyond: Working with Leigh Star, p.13. Wardle, J.L., Adams, J., Lui, C.W. and Steel, A.E., 2013. Current challenges and future directions for naturopathic medicine in Australia: a qualitative examination of perceptions and experiences from grassroots practice.BMC complementary and alternative medicine,13(1), p.15.